Dashboards end at the chart,
Strive leads to a decision
Paid, organic, CRM and web read as one system instead of four. Every chart arrives with its cause and its next best move, then hands off to agents with the reasoning attached.
Strive does the analysis, the decision stays yours
Paid, organic, CRM and web read as one system instead of four. Every chart arrives with its cause and its next best move, then hands off to agents with the reasoning attached.
Reads every tool at once
Ads, analytics, CRM and your SEO stack connect by OAuth and land in one graph. Because Strive reads them together, it can follow a first impression through to a closed deal without anyone exporting a spreadsheet.
Explains what moved, and why
A number changing is not an insight. Strive names the cause — the campaign, the page, the prompt, the deal — and shows the evidence it reasoned from, so you are reviewing an argument instead of interrogating a dashboard.
Hands the fix to an agent
Approve a proposal and it becomes real work: a page in your CMS, a budget change in your ad account, a test in your experiment tool. Strive tracks it through and records what it moved, so the next proposal starts smarter.
Meet the agents
that handle the busywork.
Every agent works from the same context graph, so a change one of them makes is context the rest can reason about. Your team steps in to approve, not to execute.
The join is the product.
Most stacks can tell you what happened inside one tool. Strive holds paid, organic, CRM and web in a single graph, so the questions that used to need a analyst and a spreadsheet — which channel actually sourced this pipeline — resolve on their own.
Every proposal arrives with its evidence.
Not a generic best practice. The specific move, for your site, this week — with the page, prompt, campaign and deal already attached, so reviewing it takes a minute rather than a meeting.
Approved work goes out and gets done.
Agents run the cycle end to end within the scopes you have opened. Everything else waits in the queue. Autonomy and an audit trail are not a trade-off here — every action keeps the reasoning that produced it.
Outcomes feed back into the graph.
Strive records what each approved task actually moved, and what you rejected. Publish a page and it is in the graph by morning. The context compounds, which is why the recommendations in month six are not the ones you saw in month one.
Humans approve, agents execute.
Scope autonomy per channel and pull it back at any time. Approvals can land in Slack, so the person who owns a budget signs off where they already work — and the decision is logged against the context that prompted it.
4 posts refreshed after ranking slipped past position 10Channel: #strive-approvals5 search terms consuming spend without converting — negatives readyChannel: #strive-paidTwo closed-won deals traced back to AI searchChannel: #strive-reporting4 posts refreshed after ranking slipped past position 10Channel: #strive-approvals5 search terms consuming spend without converting — negatives readyChannel: #strive-paidTwo closed-won deals traced back to AI searchChannel: #strive-reportingFAQs
Your ad platforms, analytics, CRM and SEO tools, connected by OAuth or API. Most teams finish that in an afternoon. Strive is useful once it can read two of them together — the value comes from the join, not from any single source, which is why a first recommendation usually points at something no individual dashboard could have shown you.
Not unless you turn that on, scope by scope. Strive starts in recommendation-only mode: every proposal lands in an approval queue with the page, prompt, campaign or deal it came from attached. You decide which scopes graduate to autonomous execution, and you can pull any of them back without touching the others.
No. There is no warehouse project and no migration. Strive reads the stack you already run, in place, and writes back through the same APIs — a task becomes a page in your CMS or a budget change in your ad account. If you disconnect Strive, your tools are exactly as you left them.
Plan on 90 days to the full loop. The first 30 are connection and context — the graph learns your accounts, campaigns and history before it recommends anything. The next 30 are recommendations you review. The last 30 are where you hand specific scopes over to agents and stop executing them yourself.
It gets recorded as an outcome, same as a good one. Strive tracks every approved task through to what it moved, so a miss becomes context the next recommendation is built on. That is also why the reasoning is attached to every proposal: you can reject something for a reason the system does not know yet, and it learns the constraint.
Your context graph is yours and is never pooled with another customer's. Strive runs against ISO 27001, AICPA SOC and GDPR controls, and access follows the permissions of the accounts you connect — if a seat cannot see a campaign in the source tool, it cannot see it in Strive.
It replaces the executing, not the deciding. The work that moves to agents is the busywork with a known shape: the refresh, the internal link, the negative keyword, the weekly report. What stays with people is judgement — which bets to make, what the brand will and will not say, and whether a proposal is right for a quarter the system cannot see.
Autonomous, never unaccountable
Every action Strive takes carries a name, a record, and a way back.
